<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservative Intellectualism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativecabbie.com/2009/09/28/conservative-intellectualism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativecabbie.com/2009/09/28/conservative-intellectualism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:10:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glen Beck &#124; Conservative Cabbie</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativecabbie.com/2009/09/28/conservative-intellectualism/comment-page-1/#comment-14841</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Beck &#124; Conservative Cabbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativecabbie.com/?p=1601#comment-14841</guid>
		<description>[...] referred to Charles Murray&#8217;s original comments back in September in this post. I concluded: Whilst I agree with Murray on the timeline of conservative success, I do disagree [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] referred to Charles Murray&#8217;s original comments back in September in this post. I concluded: Whilst I agree with Murray on the timeline of conservative success, I do disagree [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhoda Klapp</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativecabbie.com/2009/09/28/conservative-intellectualism/comment-page-1/#comment-9609</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhoda Klapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativecabbie.com/?p=1601#comment-9609</guid>
		<description>Marxism went on after Karl was dead. Anyway, we have a...philosophy? a golfbag of principles? Certainly NOT an ideology, like those other people.  It&#039;d be nice to see a politician, rather than a broadcaster picked for audience appeal, who could articulate those principles (and stick to them?).  But when you espouse an individualist, rather than a collective approach, getting movement going is like herding cats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marxism went on after Karl was dead. Anyway, we have a&#8230;philosophy? a golfbag of principles? Certainly NOT an ideology, like those other people.  It&#8217;d be nice to see a politician, rather than a broadcaster picked for audience appeal, who could articulate those principles (and stick to them?).  But when you espouse an individualist, rather than a collective approach, getting movement going is like herding cats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
